MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4403446702 · doi:10.1109/tia.2024.3482274

Resilient Ratio Control Assisted Virtual Inertia for Frequency Regulation of Hybrid Power System Under DoS Attack and Communication Delay

2024· article· en· W4403446702 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

VenueIEEE Transactions on Industry Applications · 2024
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEnergy
TopicPower Systems and Renewable Energy
Canadian institutionsUniversité Laval
Fundersnot available
KeywordsAutomatic frequency controlPower controlPower (physics)Control (management)InertiaControl systemComputer scienceControl theory (sociology)Electrical engineeringEngineeringTelecommunicationsPhysics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Due to the presence of Denial-of-Service (DoS) attacks and communication time delay (CTD), frequency regulation of a thermal and wind plants-based hybrid power system (HPS) with wind power fluctuations and load variations may not be guaranteed, and in the worst situation overall system may be destabilized. This paper addresses a robust proportional-integral (PI) controller to compensate for the impact of CTD and for the first time, an intelligent fuzzy logic-assisted ratio control-based virtual inertia (VI) is implemented for handling the DoS attacks. The controller's design is carried out using physics-inspired optimization called Fick's law optimization (FLO), where Kharitonov's theorem is used to obtain the maximum and minimum bounds of the controller. The effectiveness of proposed control design is assessed by considering the various practical scenarios such as cyber-attacks, parametric uncertainties, varying CTD, stochastic wind power fluctuations, industrial and domestic loads, step load perturbations and the presence of system nonlinearities such as generator dead band (GDB), valve limits and generator rate constraint (GRC). Moreover, for the stability assessment of the proposed control design, maximum sensitivity <inline-formula xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink"><tex-math notation="LaTeX">$( {{{{\bm{M}}}_{\bm{S}}}} )$</tex-math></inline-formula> based stability evaluation is employed. Finally, the controller performance is also evaluated upon a multi-machine interconnected IEEE-39 bus system.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.970
Threshold uncertainty score0.855

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.018
GPT teacher head0.261
Teacher spread0.243 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it