A First-Passage Model of Intravitreal Drug Delivery and Residence Time—Influence of Ocular Geometry, Individual Variability, and Injection Location
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Purpose: Standard of care for various retinal diseases involves recurrent intravitreal injections. This motivates mathematical modeling efforts to identify influential factors for ocular drug residence time, aiming to minimize administration frequency. We sought to describe the vitreal diffusion of therapeutics in nonclinical species frequently used during drug development assessments. In human eyes, we investigated the impact of variability in vitreous cavity size and eccentricity, and in injection location, on drug disposition. Methods: Using a first-passage time approach, we modeled the transport-controlled distribution of two standard therapeutic protein formats (Fab and IgG) and elimination through anterior and posterior pathways. Anatomical three-dimensional geometries of mouse, rat, rabbit, cynomolgus monkey, and human eyes were constructed using ocular images and biometry datasets. A scaling relationship was derived for comparison with experimental ocular half-lives. Results: Model simulations revealed a dependence of residence time on ocular size and injection location. Delivery to the posterior vitreous resulted in increased vitreal half-life and retinal permeation. Interindividual variability in human eyes had a significant influence on residence time (half-life range of 5-7 days), showing a strong correlation to axial length and vitreal volume. Anterior exit was the predominant route of drug elimination. Contribution of the posterior pathway displayed a 3% difference between protein formats but varied between species (10%-30%). Conclusions: The modeling results suggest that experimental variability in ocular half-life is partially attributed to anatomical differences and injection site location. Simulations further suggest a potential role of the posterior pathway permeability in determining species differences in ocular pharmacokinetics.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.004 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".