MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4403458290 · doi:10.12890/2024_004748

Newest “co-members” of the 1000s club: A case of severe transaminitis secondary to Epstein-Barr and dengue virus co-infection in a returning traveler

2024· article· en· W4403458290 on OpenAlexaff
Parsa Tahvildar, Marina Atalla, Rabia Tahir, Andrew Cheung

Bibliographic record

VenueEuropean Journal of Case Reports in Internal Medicine · 2024
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicMosquito-borne diseases and control
Canadian institutionsMcMaster University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMedicineDengue feverVirologyDengue virusClub

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Background: Timely identification of the etiology of transaminitis is critical in informing subsequent management as strategies can vary from supportive care to urgent transplant assessment. This is especially important in returning travelers as there may be multiple causes of injury that need to be addressed. Case report: We present a case of severe transaminitis secondary to non-hepatitis viral co-infections. A 28-year-old south Asian male returning traveler presented with an acute liver injury (aspartate aminotransferase/alanine aminotransaminase levels of ≥4000 IU/l) and marked jaundice. A thorough and expanded work-up of acute hepatitis was negative aside from positive mononucleosis spot testing and positive dengue fever serologies. This atypical presentation of mononucleosis and dengue fever was managed conservatively, and the patient was discharged with outpatient follow-up after an eight-day admission. Conclusions: Usually, non-hepatitis viruses typically do not present with severe transaminitis or hyperbilirubinemia. These viruses, such as infectious mononucleosis and dengue fever, may work synergistically to cause an elevated inflammatory response, resulting in severe transaminitis in returning travelers. In the absence of a classic clinical presentation, clinicians should be aware of co-infections in returning travelers and test for them based on a thorough history and physical examination. LEARNING POINTS: The differential diagnosis for severe transaminitis is narrow and commonly includes viral hepatitis (A-E), drug-induced liver injury, vascular and autoimmune causes; however other causes exist, and greater clinical awareness is needed.This case study demonstrates that even in the absence of a classic clinical presentation; in returning travelers, clinicians should have a low index of suspicion to order appropriate screening serologies based on a thorough history and physical examination as they can be sensitive diagnostic tools in detecting the etiology of severe transaminitis.In rare cases, non-hepatitis virus may act synergistically to cause severe transaminitis and should be considered in returning travelers when viral hepatitis serologies are negative.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.002
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Case report · Consensus signal: Case report
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.051
Threshold uncertainty score0.566

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0020.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.013
GPT teacher head0.293
Teacher spread0.280 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designCase report
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2024
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueEuropean Journal of Case Reports in Internal MedicineSame topicMosquito-borne diseases and controlFrench-language works237,207