Exploring Factors Affecting People’s Acceptance of Connected Vehicle Technology in China
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Connected vehicles (CVs) leverage the vehicle‐to‐everything (V2X) function to interact with various mobility systems. In China, regulations mandate that CVs must possess automatic recording capabilities as stipulated by the “Management Specification for Road Tests of Intelligent CVs.” Yet, public perception of these functionalities and their impact on the acceptance of V2X technology remains unclear. This study explores the acceptance of V2X in China by augmenting the Unified Theory of Acceptance and Use of Technology (UTAUT) framework. Utilizing a survey of 567 Chinese drivers, we employed structural equation modeling (SEM) and Multiple Indicators Multiple Causes (MIMIC) analysis to dissect the factors influencing the behavioral intention (BI) to use V2X. Our findings reveal that social influence (SI), facilitating conditions (FC), and effort expectancy (EE) significantly predict the intention to adopt V2X. Interestingly, while trust (T) does not exert a direct influence, its overall effect on BI surpasses those of the previously mentioned factors. Moreover, the MIMIC models highlight that individuals’ understanding of V2X significantly shapes their acceptance attitudes. These insights underscore the importance of enhancing T, particularly in the data security aspects of V2X, to bolster its acceptance in China. By addressing these concerns, stakeholders can pave the way for wider adoption of this pivotal technology.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.003 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.002 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".