Exome variant prioritization in a large cohort of hearing-impaired individuals indicates IKZF2 to be associated with non-syndromic hearing loss and guides future research of unsolved cases
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Abstract Although more than 140 genes have been associated with non-syndromic hereditary hearing loss (HL), at least half of the cases remain unexplained in medical genetic testing. One reason is that pathogenic variants are located in ‘novel’ deafness genes. A variant prioritization approach was used to identify novel (candidate) genes for HL. Exome-wide sequencing data were assessed for subjects with presumed hereditary HL that remained unexplained in medical genetic testing by gene-panel analysis. Cases in group AD had presumed autosomal dominantly inherited HL (n = 124), and in group AR, presumed autosomal recessive HL (n = 337). Variants in known and candidate deafness genes were prioritized based on allele frequencies and predicted effects. Selected variants were tested for their co-segregation with HL. Two cases were solved by variants in recently identified deafness genes ( ABHD12 , TRRAP ). Variant prioritization also revealed potentially causative variants in candidate genes associated with recessive and X-linked HL. Importantly, missense variants in IKZF2 were found to co-segregate with dominantly inherited non-syndromic HL in three families. These variants specifically affected Zn 2+ -coordinating cysteine or histidine residues of the zinc finger motifs 2 and 3 of the encoded protein Helios. This finding indicates a complex genotype–phenotype correlation for IKZF2 defects, as this gene was previously associated with non-syndromic dysfunction of the immune system and ICHAD syndrome, including HL. The designed strategy for variant prioritization revealed that IKZF2 variants can underlie non-syndromic HL. The large number of candidate genes for HL and variants therein stress the importance of inclusion of family members for variant prioritization.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".