T1- and T2-weighted MRI signal and histology findings in suboptimally fixed human brains
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Neuroscientific research that requires brain tissue depends on brain banks that provide very small tissue samples fixed by immersion in neutral-buffered formalin (NBF), while anatomy laboratories could provide full brain specimens. However, these brains are generally fixed by perfusion of the full body with solutions other than NBF generally used by brain banks, such as an alcohol-formaldehyde solution (AFS) that is typically used for dissection and teaching. Therefore, fixation quality of these brains needs to be assessed to determine their usefulness in post-mortem investigations through magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) and histology, two common neuroimaging modalities. Here, we report the characteristics of five brains fixed by full body perfusion of an AFS from our Anatomy Laboratory suspected of being poorly fixed, given the altered signal seen on T1w MRI scans in situ. We describe 1- the characteristics of the donors; 2- the fixation procedures applied for each case; 3- the tissue contrast characteristics of the T1w and T2w images; 4- the macroscopic tissue quality after extraction of the brains; 5- the macroscopic arterial characteristics and presence or absence of blood clots; and 6- four histological stains of the areas that we suspected were poorly fixed. We conclude that multiple factors can affect the fixation quality of the brain. Nevertheless, cases in which brain fixation is suboptimal, consequently altering the T1w signal, still have T2w of adequate gray-matter to white-matter contrast and may also be used for histology stains with sufficient quality.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".