MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4403467994 · doi:10.56367/oag-044-11196

Making preclinical sepsis research stronger, faster, and more responsive to patients

2024· article· en· W4403467994 on OpenAlexaffabout
Manoj M. Lalu, Forough Jahandideh, Saad Y. Salim, Braedon McDonald, Asher A. Mendelson

Bibliographic record

VenueOpen Access Government · 2024
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicSepsis Diagnosis and Treatment
Canadian institutionsUniversity of ManitobaUniversity of CalgaryOttawa Hospital
Fundersnot available
KeywordsSepsisMedicinePsychologyInternal medicine

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Making preclinical sepsis research stronger, faster, and more responsive to patients Sepsis represents a significant global burden. The National Preclinical Sepsis Platform (NPSP) is leading vital sepsis research, informing policy, driving innovation, and ultimately saving lives. Sepsis is a devastating condition triggered by the body’s extreme response to an infection. Patients with sepsis are often admitted to an intensive care unit (ICU), where they are given a barrage of life-saving treatments to combat the infection and restore basic organ functions like breathing and circulation. Despite our medical advancements, mortality rates for sepsis remain unacceptably high, with 30-50% of patients dying from this condition. In Canada, sepsis accounts for one in every 18 deaths and imposes a staggering $1.7bn burden on the healthcare system each year.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesScholarly communication
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.147
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.000
Open science0.0000.002
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.493
GPT teacher head0.598
Teacher spread0.105 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2024
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueOpen Access GovernmentSame topicSepsis Diagnosis and TreatmentFrench-language works237,207