MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4403468073 · doi:10.1021/acssuschemeng.4c04256

Catalyst-Free Biodegradable Chitosan-Based Dual Dynamic Covalent Networks with Self-Healing and Flame-Retardant Properties

2024· article· en· W4403468073 on OpenAlexafffund
Mohammad H. Mahaninia, Ning Yan

Bibliographic record

VenueACS Sustainable Chemistry & Engineering · 2024
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMaterials Science
TopicPolymer composites and self-healing
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Toronto
FundersNatural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of CanadaCanada Research Chairs
KeywordsFire retardantChitosanSelf-healingCovalent bondMaterials scienceChemistryChemical engineeringOrganic chemistryComposite materialEngineering

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Synthesizing covalent adaptable networks (CANs) from chitosan has been difficult due to its inherent insolubility in organic solvents. In this study, we report a facile approach for obtaining biobased flame-retarding CANs using chitosan as the starting material without dissolving it. These novel CANs were prepared via a dual cross-linking strategy in which chitosan consecutively reacted with citric acid and a vanillin-based cross-linker containing a flame-retarding moiety. The chitosan-based CANs attained dual dynamic bond-exchange sites resulting from generation of amide and ester linkages, which enabled them to perform self-healing and recyclability. They also possessed remarkable flame-retarding performance (e.g., limiting oxygen index of 41.5% and UL-94 V-0 rating), surpassing other chitosan-based flame retardants reported in the literature to date. By investigating the CAN’s response to fire in both gas and condensed phases, their flame-retarding mechanisms were uncovered. This study pinpoints a promising approach to make biobased, biodegradable, and multifunctional CANs from chitosan.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.158
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.003
GPT teacher head0.173
Teacher spread0.170 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations10
Published2024
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueACS Sustainable Chemistry & EngineeringSame topicPolymer composites and self-healingFrench-language works237,207