A flow cytometric approach to compare stem cell apoptosis in aplastic anemia and hypoplastic myelodysplastic syndrome
Bibliographic record
Abstract
BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES: Aplastic anemia (AA) is a disease caused by bone marrow (BM) failure. There are many similarities between AA and hypoplastic myelodysplastic syndrome (MDS); hence, differentiating them could be problematic. The current study aimed to use the new technique of flow cytometry as a possible diagnostic tool for AA and hypoplastic MDS. PATIENTS AND METHODS: The BM mononuclear cell (BMMC) and blood samples from 44 participants (17 patients with AA, 13 with hypoplastic MDS, and 14 healthy controls) were collected. The flow cytometric analysis of the cluster of differentiation 34 (CD34) levels and cell apoptosis was performed for all sample types. RESULTS: Patients with hypoplastic MDS showed a high percentage of CD34+ cells with low apoptosis, while those with AA showed a low percentage of CD34+ cells with high apoptosis. CONCLUSIONS: Despite the similarity in the clinical presentation of hypoplastic MDS and AA, they are biologically different disorders. Increased CD34+ cell numbers with high viability may provide a useful and accurate tool for the differential diagnosis of hypoplastic MDS from AA.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".