MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4403483737 · doi:10.62920/t131k158

L' économie des populations paléohistoriques de l’Anse à Henry à Saint-Pierre et Miquelon révélée par l’analyse fonctionnelle des outils en pierre taillée : un exemple de diversité des pratiques ancestrales autochtones

2024· article· en· W4403483737 on OpenAlexaffabout
Éloïse St-Pierre

Bibliographic record

VenueFacteurs humains : · 2024
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldSocial Sciences
TopicPleistocene-Era Hominins and Archaeology
Canadian institutionsUniversité Laval
Fundersnot available
KeywordsHumanitiesSAINTPhilosophyArtArt history

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The archaeological site of Anse à Henry, located in the French archipelago of Saint-Pierre et Miquelon was occasionally occupied by Pre-Inuit and Recent Tradition populations for more than 5 000 years. Archaeologists suggest that the site was used for the exploitation of its marine resources. Indeed, its geographic location would have been favorable for hunting marine mammals and fishing. However, this hypothesis could not be verified or confirmed since no zooarchaeological data were collected. A use-wear analysis was therefore carried out to study the Pre-Inuit and Recent Tradition lithic tools and identify the activities for which they were used. The project’s goal was to establish the economic profile of the communities, considering the duration of the occupation and the cultural distinctions on the site. The results show that Pre-Inuit and Recent Tradition populations acquired similar resources but exploited them in different ways. These distinctions suggest that the economic system of each group was regulated by subsistence strategies specific to them, despite sharing similar environmental conditions. This research demonstrates the diversity and complexity of native ancestral practices.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow), Science and technology studies
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.345
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0030.002
Scholarly communication0.0000.001
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.082
GPT teacher head0.344
Teacher spread0.262 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2024
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueFacteurs humains :Same topicPleistocene-Era Hominins and ArchaeologyFrench-language works237,207