Design, Analysis, and Testing of an Additively Manufactured Catalytic Combustor for a Micro-Wave Rotor Turbine
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Abstract In this paper, an additively manufactured (AM) Inconel catalytic combustor was tested in combination with a microwave rotor turbine with nonaxial channels designed for shaft power extraction. This was done in an open-loop configuration over a range of operating conditions in order to characterize the behavior of the wave rotor and combustor separately. The catalytic combustor data yielded low pressure losses of approximately 1% and provided stable and continuous operation up to outlet temperatures of 900 °C and combustion efficiencies of up to 99%. The data also revealed a high sensitivity to local over-fueling and hotspots that severely reduced service life. This is attributed to the additive manufacturing process producing uneven fuel injector hole sizes that cause uneven fuel mixing upstream of the catalytic reactor. However, it showed that first, it is possible to manufacture and coat an additively manufactured catalytic core. Second, it showed that the design freedom of AM could be used to make catalytic combustors viable in commercial applications.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".