A Computational Study of Heteroatom Analogues of Selenoxide and Selenone syn Eliminations
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Selenoxide syn elimination is a widely used method for the synthesis of alkenes because it proceeds under exceptionally mild conditions, typically with excellent regio- and stereoselectivity. Surprisingly, hetero-selenoxide eliminations, where one or both olefinic carbon atoms are replaced with heteroatoms, have been little investigated, and their selenonyl counterparts even less so. A variety of such reactions, where the heteroatoms included combinations of O, N and S, as well as C, were investigated computationally. Selenoxides typically have lower activation energies and are slightly endothermic, while the corresponding selenones display higher activation energies and are exothermic in the gas state. The results are consistent with concerted, five-centre processes, leading to the formation of dioxygen, aldehydes, diazenes and imines from seleninyl or selenonyl peroxides, esters, hydrazines and amines, respectively. The more acidic selenenyl hydrodisulfide analogue undergoes proton transfer to the basic selenoxide oxygen atom instead of concerted elimination, resulting in the formation of a zwitterion. However, the formation of the corresponding selenonyl zwitterion is disfavoured compared to concerted syn elimination. The effects of solvents were also computed along with changes in enthalpy, entropy and free energy. Solvent effects were variable, while free energy calculations indicated overall ΔG values ranging between 3.60 and −32.12 kcal mol−1 for the syn eliminations of methyl methanethioseleninate and methaneperoxyselenonic acid, respectively. These computations suggest that the olefin-forming selenoxide syn elimination may be more general than currently understood and that replacement of the two carbon atoms with heteroatoms can lead to viable processes.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.006 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".