The Effect of Educational Media Website and Surveillance on Risk Behavior for Prevention of Premarital Sex and Sexual Violence in Adolescents in Gorontalo Regency High School
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Objective: This study aims to assess the effect of website media and surveillance on risk behaviors to prevent premarital sex and sexual violence among high school adolescents in Gorontalo Regency. Materials and Methods: Quasi-experimental research with non-equivalent control group design. Involving 158 adolescent students who were divided into two, namely the intervention group was given education through the Si Waspada Diri website media and the control group was given G'sites, both of which contained material modified from the Comprehensive Sexuality and Reproductive Health Education (CSHE) guidelines. The sampling technique was proportional systematic random sampling with sample criteria aged 15-18 years who were already dating. The research instrument was a knowledge, attitude and practice questionnaire that had previously been tested for validity and reliability Results: Knowledge, attitudes and practices of preventing premarital sex and sexual violence were significantly better using the Si Waspada Diri website and G'Sites. With a p value of less than 0.005, the mean difference after education showed that using the website was more beneficial than using G'Sites in terms of knowledge and attitude. In addition, for practices, p = 1.000 showed no significant difference between the two groups. Conclusion: Comprehensive sexual and reproductive health education materials such as Si Waspada Diri websites and G'sites help lower teenage sexual behavior practices, promote good attitudes, and raise awareness. Nonetheless, G'sites are less successful than websites in raising awareness and attitudes.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.008 | 0.013 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.002 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".