MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4403511241 · doi:10.1109/tnsm.2024.3483013

A Data Completion Algorithm Based on Low-Rank Prior Knowledge for Data-Driven Applications

2024· article· en· W4403511241 on OpenAlexaff
Jun Tang, Bing Guo, Yan Shen, Sahil Garg, Georges Kaddoum, M. Shamim Hossain

Bibliographic record

VenueIEEE Transactions on Network and Service Management · 2024
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldComputer Science
TopicNeural Networks and Applications
Canadian institutionsÉcole de Technologie Supérieure
Fundersnot available
KeywordsComputer scienceAlgorithmData mining

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Low rank tensor ring based data recovery algorithms have been widely used in data-driven consumer electronics to recover missing data entries in the collecting data pre-processing stage for providing stable and reliable service. However, traditional recovery methods often fail to utilize the abundant prior knowledge of data and the non-local self-similarity of the data, thus leading to the failure to effectively capture the spatial relationships within high-dimensional data to recover them accurately. To address these problems, we present a novel Non-local Self-similarity and Low-rank Prior Knowledge based tensor ring completion method. Firstly, we incorporate the BM3D denoising operator within a Plug-and-Play framework to exploit the self-similarity in the data. Then a logarithmic determinant function is integrated to distinguish singular values in the cyclic unfolding matrix of the tensor and adopts a tensor ring completion approach based on weighted nuclear norms. Finally, in order to evaluate the effectiveness of our proposed method, we conducted a series of experiments by using the missing image dataset and the missing traffic data dataset respectively, and the experimental results show that our method achieves the highest level in terms of data recovery accuracy.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Other design · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Methods · Consensus signal: Methods
Teacher disagreement score0.849
Threshold uncertainty score0.832

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0010.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0020.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.046
GPT teacher head0.296
Teacher spread0.250 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designOther design
Domainnot available
GenreMethods

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2024
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueIEEE Transactions on Network and Service ManagementSame topicNeural Networks and ApplicationsFrench-language works237,207