MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4403512878 · doi:10.1145/3689429

A New Tensor Summary Statistic for Real-Time Detection of Stealthy Anomaly in Avatar Interaction

2024· article· en· W4403512878 on OpenAlexaff
Jiuzhen Zeng, Laurence T. Yang, Chao Wang, Xianjun Deng

Bibliographic record

VenueACM Transactions on Multimedia Computing Communications and Applications · 2024
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldComputer Science
TopicAnomaly Detection Techniques and Applications
Canadian institutionsSt. Francis Xavier University
FundersNational Key Research and Development Program of China
KeywordsComputer scienceAvatarAnomaly detectionStatisticTensor (intrinsic definition)Anomaly (physics)Data miningHuman–computer interactionStatisticsMathematicsPhysics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Avatar is one of the most intuitive central components in Metaverse and faces serious security problems, particularly during the interaction with each other. In this article, we consider the problem of timely detecting the stealthy anomaly in the avatar interaction, which is crucial for security and privacy in Metaverse. With this goal, a new tensor summary statistic is proposed first to well depict the statistical discrepancy between normal and anomalous interaction volume samples, even when anomalies are stealthy. The proposed tensor summary statistic is established from the tensor linear representation residual, which naturally implies the statistical probability that an interaction volume sample lies within or deviates from the tensor lateral space. Moreover, a convex optimization programme is introduced to robustly recover the tensor lateral space in the presence of anomalous samples, thereby enhancing the robustness of our tensor summary statistic. On the basis of the tensor summary statistic, a non-parametric statistic framework is developed for the real-time detection of the stealthy interaction volume anomaly. We also provide theoretical analysis concerning its detection performance and parameter selection. Extensive experiments using synthetic and real-world datasets verify our effectiveness and superiority. Compared with benchmark methods, the proposed detection scheme achieves significantly lower detection delay and higher false alarm period, particularly in the detection of stealthy anomalies with a low change rate.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.002
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.014
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Methods · Consensus signal: Methods
Teacher disagreement score0.002
Threshold uncertainty score0.011

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0020.014
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0020.002
Science and technology studies0.0000.001
Scholarly communication0.0010.003
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.022
GPT teacher head0.312
Teacher spread0.290 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreMethods

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations3
Published2024
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueACM Transactions on Multimedia Computing Communications and ApplicationsSame topicAnomaly Detection Techniques and ApplicationsFrench-language works237,207