MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4403513514 · doi:10.1016/j.gde.2024.102270

Emerging interactions between RNA methylation and chromatin architecture

2024· review· en· W4403513514 on OpenAlexafffund
Amber Louwagie, Ly Vu

Bibliographic record

VenueCurrent Opinion in Genetics & Development · 2024
Typereview
Languageen
FieldBiochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology
TopicRNA modifications and cancer
Canadian institutionsSpinal Cord Injury BCTerry Fox Research Institute
FundersMichael Smith Health Research BCTerry Fox Research InstituteCanadian Institutes of Health ResearchLeukemia and Lymphoma SocietyAmerican Society of HematologyV Foundation for Cancer Research
KeywordsBiologyChromatinComputational biologyRNADNA methylationMethylationEvolutionary biologyGeneticsDNAGene expressionGene

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Epitranscriptomics, the study of chemical modifications of RNA molecules, is increasingly recognized as an important component of gene expression regulation. While the majority of research has focused on N 6 -methyladenosine (m 6 A) RNA methylation on mRNAs, emerging evidence has revealed that the m 6 A modification extends beyond mRNAs to include chromatin-associated RNAs (caRNAs). CaRNAs constitute an important class of RNAs characterized by their interaction with the genome and epigenome. These features allow caRNAs to be actively involved in shaping genome organization. In this review, we bring into focus recent findings of the dynamic interactions between caRNAs and chromatin architecture and how RNA methylation impacts caRNAs’ function in this interplay. We highlight several enabling techniques, which were critical for genome-wide profiling of caRNAs and their modifications. Given the nascent stage of the field, we emphasize on the need to address critical gaps in study of these modifications in more relevant biological systems. Overall, these exciting progress have expanded the scope and reach of epitranscriptomics, unveiling new mechanisms that underpin the control of gene expression and cellular phenotypes, with potential therapeutic implications.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Review · Consensus signal: Review
Teacher disagreement score0.994
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.080
GPT teacher head0.413
Teacher spread0.332 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreReview

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations8
Published2024
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueCurrent Opinion in Genetics & DevelopmentSame topicRNA modifications and cancerFrench-language works237,207