MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4403514781 · doi:10.1080/03630269.2024.2371884

Venous Thromboembolism in Individuals with Sickle Cell Disease: A Narrative Review

2024· review· en· W4403514781 on OpenAlexaff
Ismail A. Raslan, Ziad Solh, Kevin H.M. Kuo, Jameel Abdulrehman

Bibliographic record

VenueHemoglobin · 2024
Typereview
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicHemoglobinopathies and Related Disorders
Canadian institutionsWestern UniversityUniversity of Toronto
Fundersnot available
KeywordsNarrative reviewDiseaseMedicineVenous thromboembolismNarrativeCellIntensive care medicineInternal medicineGeneticsBiologyThrombosisPhilosophyLinguistics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Sickle cell disease (SCD) is an inherited hemoglobinopathy characterized by vaso-occlusion, hemolysis of red blood cells (RBC), and a predisposition for venous thromboembolism (VTE). The sickling and hemolysis of RBC culminate in coagulation system abnormalities, platelet activation, endothelial dysfunction, and impaired blood flow manifesting as a prothrombotic state. In addition, individuals with SCD are often exposed to extrinsic risk factors for VTE including recurrent hospitalizations, central venous catheters, and acute medical illnesses. The diagnosis is often challenging as symptoms may mimic other complications of SCD, and there is little data to guide diagnostic algorithms involving probability scoring in the SCD population. Non-anticoagulant strategies aimed at reducing disease severity may aid in lowering the risk of VTE, but data is limited. Furthermore, high quality evidence regarding anticoagulation in prevention and treatment of SCD is severely lacking, resulting in heterogeneity in clinical practice. In this narrative review we aim to review the prothrombotic pathophysiology of SCD, to describe the risk factors, high risk of mortality, and types of VTE in SCD, to develop an approach to the diagnosis of VTE in SCD, and to understand the limited available evidence for the prevention and treatment of VTE in SCD.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.003
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Review · Consensus signal: Review
Teacher disagreement score0.004
Threshold uncertainty score0.015

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.003
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0040.003
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0040.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.018
GPT teacher head0.317
Teacher spread0.299 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreReview

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations6
Published2024
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueHemoglobinSame topicHemoglobinopathies and Related DisordersFrench-language works237,207