MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort

Abstract PR-07: Optimally designed mRNA vaccine encoding tumor-specific antigens identified in a colorectal cancer model leads to complete tumor rejection in mice

2024· article· en· W4403520141 on OpenAlexaff
Marie‐Pierre Hardy, Krystel Vincent, Gabriel Ouellet-Lavallée, Chantal Durette, Isabelle Caron, Joël Lanoix, Mathieu Courcelles, Jean‐Philippe Laverdure, Pierre Thibault, Claude Perreault

Bibliographic record

VenueCancer Immunology Research · 2024
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldBiochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology
TopicCancer Research and Treatments
Canadian institutionsUniversité de Montréal
Fundersnot available
KeywordsColorectal cancerMedicineAntigenCancerMessenger RNACancer immunotherapyImmunologyImmunotherapyCancer researchGeneImmune systemBiologyGeneticsInternal medicine

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Abstract mRNA vaccines can be designed to encode multiple epitopes of choice, which is a crucial advantage when aiming to include a broad coverage immune response. Upon translation, the cell machinery must process the vaccine-encoded poly-epitope protein to release individual peptides. This processing step is key in inducing an immune response toward selected epitopes, as efficient processing yields a higher amount of peptide available for MHC-I presentation. The efficiency of peptide processing is greatly influenced by the peptide surrounding context (i.e. the flanking amino acids in N-and C-terminal). Aberrantly expressed tumor-specific antigens (aeTSAs) are MHC-I-associated peptides (MAPs) resulting from cancer-specific epigenetic changes and splicing aberrations. In contrast to TSAs derived from mutated protein-coding exons, aeTSAs are highly shared by different tumors. Moreover, unlike commonly used tumor-associated antigens (TAAs), they are not expressed by normal healthy cells, which is pivotal for inducing strong CD8+ T cell responses. The present study aimed to determine whether RNA vaccines encoding aeTSAs would elicit protective anti-tumor responses against a colorectal cancer cell line model (MC38). We hypothesized that multiepitope mRNA vaccine efficacy would be improved if the mRNA construct was composed of minimal epitopes (here, cancer antigens) bordered by optimal (rather than natural) flanking sequences. Thus, we designed 2 vaccine constructs encoding 5 aeTSAs identified by mass spectrometry in MC38 tumor cells. The 2 constructs differ in the identity of the amino acids flanking the antigens (natural vs. substituted antigen flanking sequences). Mice were injected subcutaneously with MC38 cells on Day 0. Three mRNA vaccine doses were administered intravenously one week apart, starting at Day 4. Vaccination with our improved mRNA vaccine design showed a clear therapeutic effect. As opposed to the natural flanking sequences design resulting in delayed tumor growth, vaccination with the substituted flanking sequences design led to the complete elimination of tumors and the survival of all mice. Elispot and dextramer stainings revealed that at least 3 of the 5 MC38 aeTSAs were immunogenic and that the amplitude of antigen-specific CD8+ T cell responses was significantly higher in mice vaccinated with the substituted flanking sequences design. Our results confirm our hypothesis that highly proficient flanking regions have intrinsic benefits that can be carried over to different antigens. From a translational perspective, our work provides new insights into the therapeutic potential of optimally designed aeTSA-encoding mRNA vaccines for treating cancers. Citation Format: Marie-Pierre Hardy, Krystel Vincent, Gabriel Ouellet-Lavallée, Chantal Durette, Isabelle Caron, Joel Lanoix, Mathieu Courcelles, Jean-Philippe Laverdure, Pierre Thibault, Claude Perreault. Optimally designed mRNA vaccine encoding tumor-specific antigens identified in a colorectal cancer model leads to complete tumor rejection in mice [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the AACR Special Conference in Cancer Research: Tumor Immunology and Immunotherapy; 2024 Oct 18-21; Boston, MA. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Immunol Res 2024;12(10 Suppl):Abstract nr PR-07.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.066
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.069
GPT teacher head0.383
Teacher spread0.315 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2024
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueCancer Immunology ResearchSame topicCancer Research and TreatmentsFrench-language works237,207