MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4403524279 · doi:10.1016/j.jqsrt.2024.109221

Calibration techniques for quantitative NO measurement using Laser-Induced Fluorescence

2024· article· en· W4403524279 on OpenAlexaff
Marie Meulemans, Antoine Durocher, Philippe Versailles, Gilles Bourque, Jeffrey M. Bergthorson

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of Quantitative Spectroscopy and Radiative Transfer · 2024
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldChemical Engineering
TopicAdvanced Combustion Engine Technologies
Canadian institutionsPolytechnique MontréalNational Research Council CanadaMcGill University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsCalibrationFluorescenceLaser-induced fluorescenceLaserRemote sensingComputer scienceOpticsAnalytical Chemistry (journal)Materials scienceChemistryPhysicsChromatographyGeographyMathematicsStatistics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Laser-Induced Fluorescence (LIF) is an essential optical diagnostic technique for the high-resolution and low-uncertainty measurement of combustion species concentration in a variety of applications and conditions. Two different calibration techniques are explored in this study to obtain quantitative Nitric Oxide (NO) concentration measurements in flames. The first technique, the most employed in the literature, uses the extrapolation of the fluorescence signal from seeded to nascent NO and is only valid under negligible NO reburn conditions. The second technique uses the optical calibration of the experimental setup to relate it to a modelled LIF signal and can be applied regardless of NO reburn. Both of these techniques are explored under two different assumptions: constant and non-constant interfering LIF signal on the NO absorption spectrum. While the former is most often used in the literature, the latter is necessary when the LIF signal from interfering species cannot be distinguished from the NO-LIF signal, especially in high pressure conditions. Hence, a total of four techniques are presented in this work and are found to be in excellent agreement when performed in different flame conditions. The calibration techniques are applied to three lean, atmospheric, laminar, premixed, methane-air flames to explore their field of applicability. Specifically, the study explores the relevance of the techniques in reburn conditions, which occur mostly in high pressure, rich, highly-seeded, or NH 3 -containing flames. This study aims to offer the reader a portfolio of calibration techniques to use according to the conditions in which they need to be applied. While this study was carried out measuring NO concentration in a stagnation flame burner, the concepts and equations presented can be transposed to the measurement of other species and to other experimental configurations. • Comparative study of several NO-LIF calibration techniques. • Extrapolation of the signal from seeded to nascent NO is only valid in conditions of negligible reburn. • Calibration of the optical coefficient via modelling is valid in any flame condition.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Methods · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.629
Threshold uncertainty score0.829

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.001
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.064
GPT teacher head0.339
Teacher spread0.275 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreMethods

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations1
Published2024
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueJournal of Quantitative Spectroscopy and Radiative TransferSame topicAdvanced Combustion Engine TechnologiesFrench-language works237,207