Identification of genetic risk variants for Type-2 Diabetes mellitus in Pakistani Pashtun population: A case-control association study
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Background and Objective: Pakistan, a South Asian developing country, is experiencing a rapid increase in number of diabetes cases. High prevalence ratio of diabetes in Pakistani population and lack of genetic research studies prompted us to design this study. This present study investigated Pakistani Pashtun population for (known and novel SNPs) and its possible correlation with Type-2 Diabetes Mellitus (T2DM). Methods: This two stage (discovery & validation stage), case-control association study included one thousand individuals (Patients with T2DM=500 & controls=500) from eight districts of Khyber Pakhtunkhwa Pakistan. The study duration/period was from March 2018 to January 2020. In the first stage (the discovery stage) the target population was screened for known and novel T2DM-associated genetic markers. In the validation stage, identified variants were confirmed for T2DM association using MassARRAY genotyping and association analysis. Results: Exome sequencing detected eleven known and four novel/new genetic markers in the study population. Novel variants were preferred over the known for follow-up analysis/validation. Among the identified variants strong associations were confirmed for the following variants; rs1781133/ANKRD65 (OR=2.10, 95%Cl=1.06–3.08, P=0.003) rs2274791/TTLL10 (OR=1.97, 95%Cl=1.36-2.62, P=0.025), rs71628928/RNF223 (OR=1.82, 95%Cl=0.97-1.92, P=0.041), and rs609805/SCNN1D (OR=2.21, 95%Cl=1.92-3.09, P=0.001) with T2DM; other reported variants showed no noticeable association (having P>0.05) with T2DM. Conclusion: This study reports new genetic risk variants for T2DM in Pashtun population providing valuable insights into the genetic basis of T2DM in this group. doi: https://doi.org/10.12669/pjms.40.10.10292 How to cite this: Jan A, Mothana RA, Kaimori JY, Muhammad T, Khan M, Ali SS, et al. Identification of genetic risk variants for Type-2 Diabetes mellitus in Pakistani Pashtun population: A case-control association study. Pak J Med Sci. 2024;40(10):2336-2343. doi: https://doi.org/10.12669/pjms.40.10.10292 This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.009 | 0.003 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".