Forest Change Mapping using Multi-Source Satellite SAR, Optical, and LiDAR Remote Sensing Data
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Abstract. This study highlights the efficacy of leveraging multi-source satellite remote sensing for precise and dependable forest change mapping. Forests play a crucial role as carbon reservoirs and are indispensable components of the global carbon and water cycle, providing essential ecosystem services. Despite their significance, forests face deforestation, diseases, and climate change threats. Recent satellite remote sensing technology advancements have facilitated accurate, persistent, and large-scale forest dynamics monitoring. New generation satellite LiDAR systems, such as GEDI and ICESat-2, offer frequent and global height information at high spatial resolutions. This research presents a processing framework for mapping forest changes by integrating SAR and optical features from Sentinel-1 and Sentinel-2 imagery with canopy heights derived from GEDI and ICESat-2 datasets. Multiple experiments and analyses were conducted in two study areas. The findings underscore the significant impact of incorporating canopy height information in enhancing the accuracy of forest change mapping, resulting in a 15% improvement in precision and a 13% enhancement in F1-score in the experimental setups. Furthermore, the developed model exhibits increased reliability and confidence in identifying correctly changed and unchanged areas while being less confident in incorrect predictions.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".