Circular Coffee Shops' Smart Approach in Montreal
Bibliographic record
Abstract
As coffee consumption continues to rise, it is becoming increasingly essential to integrate coffee waste into the circular economy framework and promote sustainability. However, uncertainties can complicate efforts to manage circularity in the coffee value chain. To address these issues, we need an innovative and sustainable system that streamlines the process while minimizing adverse effects on the environment, society, and product quality. One potential solution is to establish circular coffee shops (CC) as local depots in the coffee waste collection network that are equipped with pre-drying technologies. Considering their social and environmental impacts, this article examines the optimal location, allocation and routing decisions for CC. Our proposed business model aims to design a coffee waste collection network that minimizes costs, and we also explore different scenarios for the robustness of the results and the project's financial outlook. Based on our model's results in Montreal City, we conclude that designing circular coffee shops reduces economic and environmental impacts. Incorporating Industry 4.0 technologies into management practices holds tremendous potential for driving sustainability and circularity in the coffee value chain.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".