Patient Satisfaction and QoL in SUI: Results With Single-Incision or Full-Length Slings
Bibliographic record
Abstract
IMPORTANCE: Understanding treatment impact on quality of life of patients with stress urinary incontinence (SUI) in the short- and long-term is vital to optimizing treatment success. OBJECTIVES: This study aimed to report 36-month patient satisfaction and quality of life results from a 522 study of single-incision and full-length slings in SUI. STUDY DESIGN: This was a secondary analysis of the Altis 522 study, a prospective, multicenter, nonrandomized, noninferiority cohort study comparing the Altis single-incision sling to full-length slings for the treatment of SUI. The current study endpoints are patient-reported outcomes on quality of life related to continence status at 6, 12, 18, 24, and 36 months, measured through patient-reported, validated questionnaires: Urogenital Distress Inventory, Incontinence Impact Questionnaire, Patient Global Impression of Improvement, and Surgical Satisfaction Questionnaire. RESULTS: A total of 355 women underwent the sling procedure (184, Altis group; 171, comparator group). At 36 months, 140 (76.0%) of Altis and 101 (59.1%) of comparator group patients were assessed. Patient Global Impression of Improvement at 36 months indicated that 92.9% of Altis and 90.1% of comparator patients reported that their condition was "very much better" or "much better" ( P = 0.444). Urogenital Distress Inventory at 36 months indicated improvement in quality of life in both groups with a mean change from baseline of 41.7 ± 19.3 (Altis group; n = 140) versus 44.4 ± 22.2 (comparator group; n = 101) ( P = 0.305). The Incontinence Impact Questionnaire indicated average quality-of-life improvement of 50% in both groups from presurgery to 36 months, with a mean change from baseline of 51.8 ± 25.8 (Altis group) versus 50.2 ± 25.1 (comparator group) ( P = 0.619). CONCLUSIONS: This 36-month study demonstrated the lasting, positive effect that surgical intervention can have on patients with SUI.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".