MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4403535987 · doi:10.1093/rheumatology/keae580

Deucravacitinib, a selective, TYK2 inhibitor, in psoriatic arthritis: achievement of minimal disease activity components in a phase 2 trial

2024· article· en· W4403535987 on OpenAlexfundno aff
Arthur Kavanaugh, Laura C. Coates, Philip J. Mease, Miroslawa Nowak, Lauren Hippeli, Thomas Lehman, Subhashis Banerjee, Joseph F. Merola

Bibliographic record

VenueLara D. Veeken · 2024
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicSpondyloarthritis Studies and Treatments
Canadian institutionsnot available
FundersAbbVieCelgeneBristol-Myers Squibb CanadaGilead SciencesAmgenPfizerEli Lilly and CompanyBristol-Myers Squibb
KeywordsMedicinePsoriatic arthritisArthritisInternal medicinePharmacology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

OBJECTIVES: Deucravacitinib is a novel, oral, selective, allosteric tyrosine kinase 2 (TYK2) inhibitor belonging to a distinct class of enzyme inhibitors. In a phase 2 trial in psoriatic arthritis (NCT03881059), deucravacitinib was significantly more efficacious than placebo across multiple endpoints, including achieving minimal disease activity (MDA). This post hoc analysis further evaluated the achievement of individual components of the MDA criteria with deucravacitinib treatment and the time course of responses in the phase 2 trial. METHODS: Patients (N = 203) were randomized 1:1:1 to once daily treatment with placebo, deucravacitinib 6 mg or deucravacitinib 12 mg. The proportions of patients achieving MDA and each of the seven individual MDA components through week 16 were assessed. RESULTS: At baseline, although some patients met criteria for individual MDA components, none of the patients met the composite MDA criterion, and all components were balanced overall across treatment arms. Treatment with deucravacitinib was associated with a numerically greater mean reduction from baseline in all MDA components vs placebo over 16 weeks of treatment. At week 16, a greater percentage of patients treated with either dose of deucravacitinib vs placebo achieved the threshold criteria for meeting MDA in each of the components. CONCLUSIONS: More patients treated with deucravacitinib met each of the MDA components vs placebo, along with a higher rate of MDA response, after 16 weeks of treatment.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.003
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.002
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Randomized trial · Consensus signal: Randomized trial
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.003
Threshold uncertainty score0.018

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0030.002
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0020.001
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0010.002
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0030.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.027
GPT teacher head0.306
Teacher spread0.279 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designRandomized trial
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations12
Published2024
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueLara D. VeekenSame topicSpondyloarthritis Studies and TreatmentsFrench-language works237,207