PhoXplex: Combining Phospho-enrichable Cross-Linking with Isobaric Labeling for Quantitative Proteome-Wide Mapping of Protein Interfaces
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Integrating cross-linking mass spectrometry (XL-MS) into structural biology workflows provides valuable information about the spatial arrangement of amino acid stretches, which can guide elucidation of protein assembly architecture. Additionally, the combination of XL-MS with peptide quantitation techniques is a powerful approach to delineate protein interface dynamics across diverse conditions. While XL-MS is increasingly effective with isolated proteins or small complexes, its application to whole-cell samples poses technical challenges related to analysis depth and throughput. The use of enrichable cross-linkers has greatly improved the detectability of protein interfaces in a proteome-wide scale, facilitating global protein-protein interaction mapping. Therefore, bringing together enrichable cross-linking and multiplexed peptide quantification is an appealing approach to enable comparative characterization of structural attributes of proteins and protein interactions. Here, we combined phospho-enrichable cross-linking with TMT labeling to develop a streamline workflow (PhoXplex) for the detection of differential structural features across a panel of cell lines in a global scale. We achieved deep coverage with quantification of over 9000 cross-links and long loop-links in total including potentially novel interactions. Overlaying AlphaFold predictions and disorder protein annotations enables exploration of the quantitative cross-linking data set, to reveal possible associations between mutations and protein structures. Lastly, we discuss current shortcomings and perspectives for deep whole-cell profiling of protein interfaces at large-scale.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.003 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".