MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort
Record W4403550400 · doi:10.7759/cureus.71751

High Symptom Burden in Patients With Advanced Chronic or Prolonged Infectious Diseases: Not Only Pain

2024· article· en· W4403550400 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
Elena Angeli, Agostino Zambelli, Oscar Corli, Giovanna Bestetti, Simona Landonio, Stefania Merli, Stefania Cheli, Giuliano Rizzardini

Bibliographic record

VenueCureus · 2024
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicFrailty in Older Adults
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMedicineIntensive care medicineChronic painInternal medicinePhysical therapy

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

INTRODUCTION: The growing evidence of increased life expectancy in the future reveals the high relevance of frailty in patients with chronic-degenerative diseases; identification and management of symptoms may improve significantly their quality of life. The objective of our study was to assess the symptom burden in patients with advanced chronic or prolonged infectious diseases. MATERIALS AND METHODS: A cross-sectional study was performed enrolling 88 patients, referred to palliative care consultation for chronic pain, and evaluated using the Edmonton Symptom Assessment System to define Total Symptom Distress Score (TSDS) and high symptom burden (HSB) when more than six symptoms along with Numerical Rating Scale ≥4 were present. RESULTS: All participants reported moderate to severe pain; in addition, 86 (97.7%) experienced a lack of well-being, 81 (92%) tiredness, 67 (76.1%) lack of appetite, 66 (75%) drowsiness, 66 (75%) depression, 56 (63.6%) anxiety, 49 (55.6%) nausea, and 39 (44.3%) shortness of breath. Forty-four patients (50%) had high TSDS, greater than 40.5, and presented lower Karnofsky Performance Scale (KPS) (median 40 vs. 70, p=0.0005), higher comorbidities (median 7 vs. 4, p=0.00001), and higher drug burden (median 9 vs. 6, p=0.0003) than those with low TSDS. Furthermore, considering symptom intensity, 40 patients (45.4%) had HSB and presented lower KPS (median 50 vs. 70, p=0.0005), higher comorbidities (median 7 vs. 4, p=0.00001), and higher drug burden (mean 9 vs. 6, p=0.01) compared to patients without HSB. CONCLUSION: Our population had an HSB, in addition to pain, revealing high frailty. A correct assessment of symptoms is, therefore, required to manage patients with chronic infectious diseases. In this setting, attention should be given to identifying patients at high risk of HSB through a correct diagnosis and effective management, which should be based on a multi-professional approach.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.002
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.003
Threshold uncertainty score0.010

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.002
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.000
Open science0.0000.001
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0030.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.005
GPT teacher head0.245
Teacher spread0.240 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2024
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueCureus→Same topicFrailty in Older Adults→French-language works237,207→