Obstructive Sleep Apnea and Cardiovascular Diseases: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Prospective Studies
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Obstructive sleep apnea (OSA) is a prevalent clinical disorder characterized by intermittent airway obstruction during sleep, resulting in hypoxemia and hypercapnia. Although OSA is associated with increased cardiovascular disease (CVD) risk, such as hypertension, the precise nature of this relationship remains uncertain. This systematic review and meta-analysis aim to evaluate the potential links between OSA and cardiovascular outcomes by synthesizing data from recent prospective studies. A systematic literature search was conducted following the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) guidelines, utilizing electronic databases, including PubMed/MEDLINE, Scopus, and the Cochrane Library. The PICTS (patients, index test, comparator/reference test, target condition, study design) framework was used to structure the primary research question and define the investigation's scope. The Newcastle-Ottawa Scale (NOS) was employed for quality appraisal, and a meta-analysis was performed using Review Manager 5.4 software (Cochrane Collaboration, London, UK). The analysis included 12 studies, focusing on the association between OSA and various cardiovascular outcomes, including hypertension, coronary artery disease, congestive heart failure, cardiac arrhythmias, and cardiovascular events. The pooled relative risk (RR) from the random-effects model was 0.79 (95% CI: 0.56-1.03), indicating a non-significant reduction in cardiovascular risk associated with OSA. The results were heterogeneous, with individual studies showing both increased and decreased risk. Subgroup analyses based on study design, patient characteristics, and follow-up duration suggested that the observed associations were stable across different subsets of studies. However, the overall findings did not establish a definitive causal link between OSA and increased cardiovascular risk. This meta-analysis underscores the complex relationship between OSA and CVD, highlighting the need for further research to elucidate the underlying mechanisms and confirm the potential causal association. Despite the lack of significant findings, the high prevalence of OSA and its association with cardiovascular risk factors warrant routine screening and early intervention, particularly through continuous positive airway pressure (CPAP) therapy, which may mitigate the cardiovascular risks linked to OSA. Future studies should focus on high-quality prospective data and explore the impact of OSA management on cardiovascular outcomes.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.024 | 0.049 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.004 | 0.002 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.023 | 0.052 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.010 | 0.012 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.004 | 0.002 |
| Open science | 0.003 | 0.002 |
| Research integrity | 0.002 | 0.002 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.003 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".