MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4403553947 · doi:10.1016/j.htct.2024.09.259

GLOBAL COMPARATIVE ANTITHROMBIN-FIELD STUDY: IMPACT OF LABORATORY ASSAY VARIABILITY ON THE ASSESSMENT OF ANTITHROMBIN ACTIVITY MEASUREMENT

2024· article· en· W4403553947 on OpenAlexaff
E Seth-Chhabra, A Sadeghi-Khomami, Mingjie-Liu, Guy-Young, S W-Pipe, MC Ozelo, C Le-Camus, M Toh, SA Lima-Montalvao, Marek-Demissie

Bibliographic record

VenueHematology Transfusion and Cell Therapy · 2024
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicAcute Myocardial Infarction Research
Canadian institutionsPrecision BioLogic (Canada)
Fundersnot available
KeywordsAntithrombinMedicineInternal medicineHeparin

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Fitusiran is an investigational, subcutaneous small interfering RNA therapeutic in development for hemophilia A and B, with and without inhibitors that aims to rebalance hemostasis by targeting antithrombin (AT) mRNA to lower AT levels and restore sufficient thrombin generation. To further enhance the benefit-risk profile of fitusiran, the revised AT-based dosing regimen was designed to target AT activity levels of 15-35%. The objective of this study was to evaluate and compare AT activity measurements in hemostasis laboratories using commercially available in vitro diagnostic AT activity assays across countries. AT immunodepleted and normal pooled plasma were mixed to generate 100%, 36%, 14% and 9% (IU/dL) AT activity levels, based on the Siemens Innovance® AT activity assay. Forty-eight Hemostasis Laboratories in 16 countries, blinded to AT activity levels, tested plasma samples in triplicates on three different days. Labs used their routine chromogenic AT activity assays, which evaluate the effectiveness of AT in inhibiting human or bovine factor IIa or Xa. Pre-defined acceptable recovery criteria was set at ± 20% of assigned value with intra-assay coefficient of variation (CV) < 20%. Siemens Innovance® AT (human FXa based) assay can reliably measure antithrombin across all activity levels (CV 20%) with the highest reproducibility at 14% and 36% (CV 10%). Siemens Berichrom® and STA® -Stachrom® (bovine IIa based) assays could reliably measure 100% and 36% samples but showed lab-to-lab variability for ≤ 15% AT activity. Siemens Berichrom® had a CV > 20% for 14% and 9% samples. For Stachrom®, only 8/12 labs reported a value for the 14% sample and all labs failed to measure the 9% sample. The HemosIL® (bovine FXa based) assay significantly underestimated AT activity levels ≤ 36%. Most labs using HemosIL® failed to report any values for 14% and 9% AT samples. Clear inference regarding rarely used AT assays (each N < 4) could not be made. This study provides important data regarding the performance of commercially available, regulatory cleared AT activity assays across a range of AT activity levels. Siemens Innovance® AT (human FXa) assay can reliably measure AT activity at clinical decision points of 15%–35% (CV 10%) and is recommended for fitusiran monitoring. This assay was used for all fitusiran phase 1,2,3 clinical trials for measuring AT activity. Berichrom® and Stachrom® (bovine FIIa) assays can only be used for fitusiran monitoring after extra validation for ≤ 15% AT (CV < 20%). HemosIL® (bovine FXa) assay significantly underestimates AT activity ≤ 36% and should not be recommended for fitusiran patient management.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.002
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.260
Threshold uncertainty score0.527

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0020.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.060
GPT teacher head0.401
Teacher spread0.341 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2024
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueHematology Transfusion and Cell TherapySame topicAcute Myocardial Infarction ResearchFrench-language works237,207