(C<sub>10</sub>N<sub>2</sub>H<sub>10</sub>)(HI<sub>2</sub>O<sub>6</sub>)(HIO<sub>3</sub>)(IO<sub>3</sub>): A Birefringent Material Featuring Large π-Conjugated Organic Cation and Two Types of Iodate Anions
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Birefringent crystals, which can modulate and polarize light, play a vital role in the development of optical sensors and optoelectronic devices. Herein, we synthesized a new birefringent crystal [(C 10 N 2 H 10 )(HI 2 O 6 )(HIO 3 )(IO 3 )] with large birefringence by integrating the large π-conjugated 4,4′-bipyridine group with two types of iodates anions ([IO 3 ] − and [HI 2 O 6 ] − ) characterized by high polarizability anisotropy and strong stereochemically active lone pairs (SCALP). The crystal exhibits a large measured birefringence of 0.171 at 550 nm, surpassing most organic–inorganic hybrid iodate birefringent materials reported in the literature. Theoretical analyses reveal that the optical properties of the crystal arise primarily from the synergistic interactions between the π-conjugated 4,4′-bipyridine group and I–O groups. This research presents an effective method for the strategic integration of large π-conjugated organic cations into iodates, facilitating the design of novel birefringent materials and encouraging further exploration of superior birefringent substances.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".