2S/LGBTQ+ youth substance use and pathways to homelessness: A photovoice study
Bibliographic record
Abstract
• 2S/LGBTQ+ youth narrated their substance use and homelessness trajectories. • They took refuge in drugs to survive early-life hardships and becoming homeless. • 2S/LGBTQ+ youth also used drugs for release and to shift away from marginalization. • Stimulants were used for pleasure, connection, and experimentation amid inequity. • Drugs simultaneously invoked discomforts, including eviction from the family home. Studies have posited that substance use is associated with, or contributes to, homelessness for 2S/LGBTQ+ youth. However, interconnections between these issues are poorly articulated. This community-based photovoice study describes the narratives used by 2S/LGBTQ+ youth about how substance use featured in their pathways to homelessness. Employing constructionist narrative analysis, two storylines were inductively derived from participant-produced photographs and photovoice interviews with 32 2S/LGBTQ+ youth in Vancouver, Canada. Taking refuge narratives centered on 2S/LGBTQ+ youths’ use of substances to cope with intersecting hardships and minority stressors they had faced growing up, and when transitioning to homelessness. From playing into precarity narratives focused on the shifting possibilities and tensions of what sexualized crystal methamphetamine use can surface for 2S/LGBTQ+ youth in terms of facilitating connection and release and simultaneously invoking discomforts, including eviction from their family home. These narratives can usefully be anticipated and recognized to better understand and address the social contexts in which 2S/LGBTQ+ youth experience substance use and associated harms, especially homelessness. They affirm the need for tailored supports for 2S/LGBTQ+ youth who use drugs in the lead-up to and after becoming homeless, including the provision of care that better recognizes youths’ pursuits of becoming and belonging in the context of marginalization, and that takes a harm reduction approach to addressing the role of substance use in these pursuits.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.005 | 0.002 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.003 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.004 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".