Changes in cortical manifold structure following stroke and its relation to behavioral recovery in the male macaque
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Stroke, a major cause of disability, disrupts brain function and motor skills. Previous research has mainly focused on reorganization of the motor system post-stroke, but the effects on other brain areas and their influence on recovery is poorly understood. Here, we use functional neuroimaging in a nonhuman primate model (23 male Cynomolgus Macaques), we explore how ischemic stroke affects whole-brain cortical architecture and its relation to spontaneous behavioral recovery. By projecting patterns of cortical functional connectivity onto a low-dimensional manifold space, we find that several regions in both sensorimotor cortex and higher-order transmodal cortex exhibit significant shifts in their manifold embedding from pre- to post-stroke. Furthermore, we observe that changes in default mode and limbic network regions, and not preserved sensorimotor cortical regions, are associated with animal behavioral recovery post-stroke. These results establish the whole-brain functional changes associated with stroke, and suggest an important role for higher-order transmodal cortex in post-stroke outcomes. Using advanced brain imaging in male macaques, the authors show that both motor and higher-order brain regions, such as those involved in emotion and cognition, show significant changes after stroke, which are linked to better recovery.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".