MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4403559446 · doi:10.1016/j.micron.2024.103727

Bring your paper into the ‘Fast Lane’ of the editorial process and increase your changes for final acceptance in Micron, The International Research and Review Journal for Microscopy – Part II

2024· review· en· W4403559446 on OpenAlex
Filip Braet, Roberto Romani, Ferdinand Hofer, Ute Kaiser, R.F. Egerton

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

VenueMicron · 2024
Typereview
Languageen
FieldDecision Sciences
Topicscientometrics and bibliometrics research
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Alberta
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMaterials scienceProcess (computing)NanotechnologyPolitical scienceEngineering ethicsComputer scienceEngineeringOperating system

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

It has been ten years since the Editors of Micron contributed an editorial offering tips and tricks to help potential contributors navigate the editorial process and improve their chances of manuscript acceptance. In this contribution, we report how the updated guidelines have positively impacted the journal's content and performance over time, and provide new recommendations and insights to ensure your submission receives the attention it deserves from our editorial team.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.041
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.017
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMetaresearch, Bibliometrics, Scholarly communication
Consensus categoriesMetaresearch
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Review · Consensus signal: Review
Teacher disagreement score0.660
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0410.017
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0060.021
Science and technology studies0.0010.000
Scholarly communication0.0020.000
Open science0.0040.002
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.643
GPT teacher head0.643
Teacher spread0.000 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it