MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4403563772 · doi:10.1016/j.sleep.2024.10.022

The effects of sleep duration on the risk of dementia incidence in short and long follow-up studies: A systematic review and meta-analysis

2024· review· en· W4403563772 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
Connie Howard, Naaheed Mukadam, Esther K. Hui, Gill Livingston

Bibliographic record

VenueSleep Medicine · 2024
Typereview
Languageen
FieldPsychology
TopicSleep and related disorders
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMeta-analysisDementiaIncidence (geometry)MedicineDuration (music)Sleep (system call)Systematic reviewMEDLINEInternal medicineDiseaseBiology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Sleep duration's association with future dementia could be a cause or consequence, or both. We searched electronic databases on 14 th April 2023 for primary peer-reviewed, longitudinal studies examining the relationship between sleep duration and dementia with any follow-up duration. We meta-analysed studies examining brief (≤6 h/night) and extended sleep duration (≥9 h/night) separately and divided the studies into those with follow-up periods of less or more than 10 years. The quality of evidence was assessed using the Newcastle-Ottawa scale. 31 studies fulfilled the inclusion criteria. For brief sleep duration, a meta-analysis of short follow-up studies (≤10 years) found a 46 % increased risk of future dementia (relative risk [RR] – 1·46; 95 % Confidence Intervals [CIs] 1·48–1·77; I 2 = 88·92 %, 6 studies). Studies with long follow-ups (>10 years) did not show a significantly increased risk (RR – 1·12; 0·95–1·29; I 2 = 65·91 %; 5 studies). For extended sleep duration, a meta-analysis of short and long follow-up studies reported an increased risk of dementia (respectively RR - 2·20; 1·11–3·3; I 2 = 94·17 %; 4 studies and RR – 1·74; 1·30–2·18; I 2 = 86·56 %; 4 studies). Our findings suggest that brief sleep duration might be a prodromal symptom but not a risk factor of dementia. Extended sleep duration may be a risk factor. However, our results had high heterogeneity limiting external validity and generalisability. • • Brief sleep duration is only associated with dementia in studies with short follow-up periods (<10 years). • Extended sleep duration increased the risk of dementia in studies using short and long (≥10 years) follow-up periods. • • Heterogeneity meant that results are uncertain, and sleep duration may be associated with other risk factors. • Future research should analyse causes of sleep disturbance controlling for other risk factors and follow up of >10 years.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.022
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.044
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Meta-analysis · Consensus signal: Meta-analysis
GenreCandidate signal: Review · Consensus signal: Review
Teacher disagreement score0.022
Threshold uncertainty score0.116

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0220.044
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0030.002
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0200.055
Bibliometrics0.0090.008
Science and technology studies0.0010.001
Scholarly communication0.0040.002
Open science0.0020.002
Research integrity0.0030.002
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.052
GPT teacher head0.381
Teacher spread0.329 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designMeta-analysis
Domainnot available
GenreReview

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations18
Published2024
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueSleep MedicineSame topicSleep and related disordersFrench-language works237,207