MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4403565778 · doi:10.1101/2024.10.15.24315532

Taking Control of Your Functional Cognitive Symptoms Workbook: A Novel Intervention

2024· preprint· en· W4403565778 on OpenAlexaff
Erica Cotton, Kristen Mordecai, Laura McWhirter, Verónica Cabreira, RICHARD VAN PATTEN, Noah D. Silverberg, Aaron J. Kaat, W. Curt LaFrance

Bibliographic record

VenuemedRxiv · 2024
Typepreprint
Languageen
FieldPsychology
TopicPsychological Treatments and Assessments
Canadian institutionsUniversity of British Columbia
Fundersnot available
KeywordsWorkbookCognitionIntervention (counseling)Control (management)Cognitive InterventionCognitive psychologyPsychologyMedicinePhysical medicine and rehabilitationComputer scienceNeuroscienceBusinessPsychiatryArtificial intelligenceAccounting

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Abstract Background Functional cognitive disorder (FCD) is a subtype of functional neurological disorder (FND). FCD can present with various cognitive symptoms, precipitants, and comorbidities (other FNDs, concussion, fatigue, fibromyalgia, etc.). However, there are no widely available existing behavioral health interventions for FCD. The authors’ aim was to develop a therapist-guided treatment for FCD for widespread use among civilians and Veterans. Methods We adapted a well-known, evidence-based treatment for functional seizures (an adjacent condition often with cognitive symptoms), to fit the hypothesized mechanisms of FCD. The process is presented in GUIDED format (GUIDance for the rEporting of intervention Development). Key processes included determining broad intervention framework, detailed FCD specific content based on expert consensus, evidence, theory, target population centered approaches, specialty subgroup consideration and target population stakeholder feedback for Veteran and civilian populations. Findings We have created a comprehensive 14-chapter, manualized, therapist-guided neurobehavioral therapy protocol to target FCD symptoms independent of etiology – the Taking Control of Your Functional Cognitive Symptoms Workbook . Initial feasibility, tolerability, and utility were completed with 2 target population stakeholders with FCD (one civilian, one Veteran; both PGI-C rating = 1 “Very Much Improved”). The Template for Intervention Description and Replication (TIDieR) checklist is provided as a supplemental table. Interpretation This new promising multi-modality behavioral health intervention can be considered Stage 1 (i.e. intervention generation, refinement, modification, adaptation, and pilot testing). Further pilot testing is being conducted and will need to be followed by traditional efficacy testing (Stage 2). Key Messages FCD is an increasingly recognized subtype of FND. Despite existing models of FCD mechanisms, there are no widely available dedicated FCD-symptom focused behavioral health interventions. We have created the Taking Control of Your Functional Cognitive Symptoms: Workbook , a 14-chapter manualized therapist-guided neurobehavioral therapy protocol to target FCD symptoms regardless of cause / associated conditions, which shows early feasibility and promising clinical utility.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.004
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Other · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.010
Threshold uncertainty score0.035

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.004
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.001
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0010.001
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0010.002
Research integrity0.0010.002
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0100.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.108
GPT teacher head0.407
Teacher spread0.299 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreOther

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations2
Published2024
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venuemedRxivSame topicPsychological Treatments and AssessmentsFrench-language works237,207