MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4403582213 · doi:10.1111/cup.14733

Pacinioma of Lumbosacral Skin in Closed Spinal Dysraphism

2024· article· en· W4403582213 on OpenAlexaff
Bryan D Johnston, Katelynn Campbell

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of Cutaneous Pathology · 2024
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicSpinal Dysraphism and Malformations
Canadian institutionsSaskatchewan Health AuthoritySaskatoon City HospitalUniversity of Saskatchewan
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMedicineLumbosacral jointLesionDiastematomyeliaSpinal cordPathologyAnatomy

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Closed spinal dysraphism (CSD) is a congenital condition caused by a failure in secondary neurulation during embryogenesis. CSD is associated with characteristic cutaneous stigmata often identified clinically. Rarely, such stigmata have been reported to occur with complex congenital intraspinal lipomas containing Pacinian corpuscle hyperplasia. Herein, we present our case of an asymptomatic 8-month-old female who presented with a midline lumbosacral acrochordon-like lesion. MRI revealed a midline lipomatous lesion at S2-S3 with a fibrovascular stalk likely continuous with the acrochordon. Given the absence of neurological symptoms concerning tethered cord syndrome (TCS), only the skin lesion was removed for cosmesis. Subsequent histopathological examination revealed numerous Pacinian corpuscles in a background of dermal collagen and subcutaneous adipose tissue. No features suggested a co-existent peripheral nerve sheath lesion (such as a neurofibroma). Given the spinal cord abnormalities, and the histologic features of a pure proliferation of Pacinian corpuscles, a diagnosis of the so-called "Pacinioma" was made. To the best of our knowledge, only four other cases of complex intraspinal lipomatous lesions containing Pacinioma in the setting of CSD with a tethered cord have been previously reported. This case highlights the complexity of the cutaneous stigmata of CSD.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Case report · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.434
Threshold uncertainty score0.413

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.011
GPT teacher head0.299
Teacher spread0.288 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designCase report
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2024
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueJournal of Cutaneous PathologySame topicSpinal Dysraphism and MalformationsFrench-language works237,207