MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4403584947 · doi:10.1038/s41408-024-01160-1

Impact of COVID-19 on outcomes with teclistamab in patients with relapsed/refractory multiple myeloma in the phase 1/2 MajesTEC-1 study

2024· letter· en· W4403584947 on OpenAlexaff
Niels W.C.J. van de Donk, Nizar J. Bahlis, Luciano J. Costa, María‐Victoria Mateos, Ajay K. Nooka, Aurore Perrot, Alfred L. Garfall, Pragya Thaman, Keqin Qi, Clarissa Uhlar, Katherine Chastain, Margaret Doyle, Saad Z. Usmani

Bibliographic record

VenueBlood Cancer Journal · 2024
Typeletter
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicMultiple Myeloma Research and Treatments
Canadian institutionsInstitute of Cancer ResearchUniversity of Calgary
FundersJanssen Research and DevelopmentNational Cancer Institute
KeywordsCoronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19)Multiple myelomaRefractory (planetary science)Medicine2019-20 coronavirus outbreakSevere acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2)Internal medicinePhase (matter)OncologyIntensive care medicineVirologyBiologyDiseaseChemistry

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The risk of infection in patients with multiple myeloma (MM) is high, particularly for those with relapsed/refractory MM (RRMM), who typically exhibit substantial immune dysfunction due to multiple prior therapies as well as MM itself [ 1 , 2 ]. The recent COVID-19 pandemic had an impact on patients with MM compared with non-MM patients, including a higher risk of infection, a higher excess mortality rate, and decreased survival in 2020 compared with 2019 [ 3 ]. Patients with MM are now known to be particularly vulnerable to COVID-19 infection [ 4 ]; COVID-19 mortality rates of up to 57% have been reported in patients with MM across different institutions [ 5 ], with hematologic cancers associated with higher infection severity and mortality than other tumor types [ 6 ].

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow), Research integrity
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.092
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.005
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.034
GPT teacher head0.372
Teacher spread0.338 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations6
Published2024
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueBlood Cancer JournalSame topicMultiple Myeloma Research and TreatmentsFrench-language works237,207