Understanding the deformation creep and role of intermetallic compound-microstructure in Sn-Ag-Cu solders
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Tin-based alloys are commonly used in lead-free solder joints in electronic interconnection applications, where creep can limit joint reliability. In this work, directionally solidified bulk solder alloys of different compositions (pure tin, SAC105 and SAC305) are mechanically tested under a constant load for each composition at room temperature to understand mechanical creep performance and quantify the role of different content of Ag 3 Sn and Cu 6 Sn 5 intermetallic compounds (IMCs) in terms of secondary creep strain rate, microstructural evolution , and total amount of accumulated strain. In this work, microstructures are fabricated using directional solidification to promote a systematic variation in IMC sizes, shapes, and distributions within similar crystal orientations of the primary β-Sn matrix. Analysis of creep data indicates that secondary creep is dominated by obstacle-controlled dislocation motion . This is further confirmed by electron backscatter diffraction (EBSD) analysis, which reveals that the formation of subgrains and internal structure, correlating to the initial microstructure of the sample, i.e. changes in secondary dendrite arm spacing (λ 2 ) and eutectic intermetallic spacing (λ e ). The experimental observations are supported further by crystal plasticity simulations that explicitly model the presence of IMCs within the Sn-based samples and show the dependence of the secondary creep rate upon the IMC content, and therefore be beneficial for the possible future composition design in solders.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".