Efficacy of Electroacupuncture in the Treatment of Mild to Moderate Female Stress Urinary Incontinence: Protocol for a Systematic Review and Network Meta-Analysis
Bibliographic record
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Stress urinary incontinence (SUI), the most common form of urinary incontinence, is a condition that affects many women. It is characterized by involuntary urine leakage during activities that increase abdominal pressure, such as sneezing, coughing, or physical exertion, according to the International Continence Society. SUI affects patients' quality of life and causes depression and emotional disorders, which negatively influences physical and mental health. The participants in the studies in this review comprised women with mild to moderate SUI, because there are more female patients than male patients, and most patients with severe SUI are treated surgically. Moreover, after retrieval, there were no systematic reviews or network meta-analyses (NMAs) of conservative treatments, such as electroacupuncture (EA), in women with mild to moderate SUI. OBJECTIVE: This study aims to investigate the efficacy of electroacupuncture among women with mild to moderate SUI using an NMA. METHODS: Randomized clinical trials related to conservative treatments for SUI will be searched in 5 English and 3 Chinese literature databases: EMBASE, PubMed, Cochrane, Web of Science, ClinicalTrials.gov, Chinese National Knowledge Infrastructure (CNKI), WanFang, and the Chinese BioMedical Literature Database. The search period for these 8 electronic databases will be from 2002 to 2022. The PROSPERO database and the International Platform of Registered Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis Protocols (INPLASY) database will also be searched. Two reviewers will independently complete the research selection. After screening the studies, 2 other researchers will extract the data, and the quality of the included studies will be evaluated according to the quality standards specified in the Cochrane Collaboration Tool (version 2). The primary outcomes will be the change in urine leakage determined by a 1-hour pad test and International Consultation on Incontinence Questionnaire Short Form (ICIQ-SF) scores at baseline and at the conclusion of the follow-up. The secondary outcomes will be 72-hour incontinence episodes, residual bladder volume, effective rate, urodynamic indexes, and other reported measurements. Stata (version 14.0; StataCorp) and Review Manager (RevMan version 5.3; Cochrane) will be implemented for data synthesis and meta-analysis. RESULTS: The results are not yet accessible because this is a protocol for a systematic review and meta-analysis. The protocol was registered on INPLASY on February 22, 2023. By April 6, 2023, we had completed the literature search of the 8 databases and completed the selection and data extraction of the articles. CONCLUSIONS: The results of this systematic review will demonstrate the efficacy of EA among women with mild to moderate SUI. The results will provide evidence for clinicians and guideline makers to choose suitable treatments for SUI. TRIAL REGISTRATION: International Platform of Registered Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis Protocols (INPLASY) 202320098; https://inplasy.com/inplasy-2023-2-0098/. INTERNATIONAL REGISTERED REPORT IDENTIFIER (IRRID): DERR1-10.2196/55870.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.046 | 0.065 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.006 | 0.004 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.022 | 0.032 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.008 | 0.008 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.003 | 0.003 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.006 | 0.005 |
| Open science | 0.004 | 0.004 |
| Research integrity | 0.005 | 0.005 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.046 | 0.003 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".