MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4403590002 · doi:10.1016/j.epsl.2024.119071

Earth's hypsometry and what it tells us about global sea level

2024· article· en· W4403590002 on OpenAlexaff
Vivi Kathrine Pedersen, Natalya Gomez, J. X. Mitrovica, G. Jungdal-Olesen, Jane Lund Andersen, Julius Garbe, Andy Aschwanden, Ricarda Winkelmann

Bibliographic record

VenueEarth and Planetary Science Letters · 2024
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEarth and Planetary Sciences
TopicGeophysics and Gravity Measurements
Canadian institutionsMcGill University
FundersVillum Fonden
KeywordsGeologyEarth (classical element)Sea levelSatellite altimetryOcean surface topographyGeodesyEarth sciencePhysical geographyOceanographyGeography

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

• Earth's hypsometry shows a prominene maximum ∼2–5 m above the sea surface. • We explore how this maximum evolved over a glacial cycle and into the future. • Holocene glacial isostatic adjustment raised the maximum from the sea surface. • Residual glacial isostatic adjustment will raise the maximum a further ∼2 m. • Alternatively the maximum may reflect a longer-term mean state of earth's sea level. Over geological time scales, the combination of solid-Earth deformation and climate-dependent surface processes have resulted in a distinct hypsometry (distribution of surface area with elevation) on Earth, with the highest concentration of surface area focused near the present-day sea surface. However, in addition to a single, well-defined maximum at the present-day sea surface, Earth's hypsometry is also characterized by a prominent maximum ∼2–5 m above this level, with the range accounting for uncertainties in recent digital elevation models. Here we explore the nature of this enigmatic maximum and examine, using a gravitationally self-consistent model of ice-age sea-level change, how it evolved over the last glacial cycle and may evolve moving towards a near-ice-free future. We argue that the hypsometric maximum captures topographic conditions at the end of the last deglaciation phase and subsequent glacial isostatic adjustment (GIA) raised it from the sea surface to its present-day elevation. Moreover, ongoing GIA will raise the maximum a further ∼2 m in the absence of future ice mass loss. If a portion of the hypsometric maximum has persisted for longer than Holocene time scales, the resulting GIA-converged elevation of the hypsometric maximum at +4–7 m above the sea surface implies a longer-term mean state of the Earth that may reflect lower ice volumes, trends in erosion, dynamic topography, or a combination of these. The signature of these various contributions on present-day hypsometry is intimately connected to the time scale of erosional and depositional processes near shorelines.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.004
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.006
Threshold uncertainty score0.011

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.004
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0020.002
Science and technology studies0.0000.003
Scholarly communication0.0030.007
Open science0.0000.001
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0030.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.021
GPT teacher head0.214
Teacher spread0.193 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2024
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueEarth and Planetary Science LettersSame topicGeophysics and Gravity MeasurementsFrench-language works237,207