MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4403594647 · doi:10.5539/esr.v13n1p1

Mechanical Microdeformation and Kink–band Formation in Mica from the Colônia Impact Crater, São Paulo, Brazil

2024· article· en· W4403594647 on OpenAlexvenueno aff
Victor F. Velázquez, José Maria Azevedo Sobrinho, Rodrigo F. Lucena, Alethéa Ernandes Martins Sallun, William Sallun Filho

Bibliographic record

VenueEarth Science Research · 2024
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldPhysics and Astronomy
TopicPlanetary Science and Exploration
Canadian institutionsnot available
FundersConselho Nacional de Desenvolvimento Científico e Tecnológico
KeywordsImpact craterMicaGeologyMaterials sciencePhysicsAstrobiologyPaleontology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

A comprehensive examination using a transmitted light optical microscope was conducted to analyze the morphology and geometric parameters of kink band development in mica from the Colônia impact crater's crystalline basement rocks. Significant differences were observed between kink bands formed perpendicular and parallel to the [001] plane. Kink bands perpendicular to the [001] are narrow and elongated, exhibiting two distinct coplanar orientations with regular spacing and parallel planar fractures, which suggest a slip-dislocation strain mechanism. In contrast, kink bands parallel to the [001] plane exhibit a greater variety of shapes and a more complex internal structure. These kink bands can be grouped into six types: sigmoidal-shape, S-shape, lenticular-shape, Z-shape, Z-shape with internal dislocation, and Z-shape with internal rotation. The deformation patterns in these kink bands indicate two primary processes: flexural and shear strain. The most notable deformations induced by these strain mechanisms include the curvature of cleavage lamellae, delamination cracks, and fractures along the boundaries of kink bands. More severely deformed kink bands exhibit dislocation, rotation, and partial obliteration of internal cleavage lamellae. These characteristics differ from those of typical kink bands in tectonically deformed rocks, thereby reviving the longstanding debate regarding their potential use as alternative evidence in impact cratering investigations.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.050
Threshold uncertainty score0.099

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0020.001
Science and technology studies0.0010.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.042
GPT teacher head0.357
Teacher spread0.315 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations1
Published2024
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueEarth Science ResearchSame topicPlanetary Science and ExplorationFrench-language works237,207