RETRACTED: MobVGG: Ensemble technique for birds and drones prediction
Post-publication record
OpenAlex flags this work as retracted, but it carries no matching Retraction Watch record in this frame.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Detection of aerial activities, including drones and birds, has practical implications for automating bird surveys and developing radar systems for aerial object collision detection. Convolutional neural networks (CNNs) have been extensively utilized for image recognition and classification tasks, albeit prior research predominantly focuses on single-class 'drone' classification. However, a gap persists in achieving high accuracy for multi-class classification. To address the limitations of traditional CNNs, such as vanishing gradients and the necessity for numerous layers, this study introduces a novel model termed "MobVGG." This model combines the architectures of MobileNetV2 and VGG16 to accurately classify images as either 'bird' or 'drone'. The dataset comprises 4212 images for each category of 'bird' and 'drone'. The stringent methodology was applied for dataset preparation and model training to ensure the reliability of the findings. Comparative analysis with previous research demonstrates that the proposed MobVGG model, trained on both 'bird' and 'drone' images, achieves superior accuracy (96 %) compared to benchmark studies. Our paper targets researchers and graduate students as its primary audience.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.002 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.006 | 0.003 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".