Uncovering Backbone Conformation for Rigid DPP-Based Donor–Acceptor Conjugated Polymer Using Deuterium Labeling and Neutron Scattering
Bibliographic record
Abstract
High Resolution Image Download MS PowerPoint Slide The conjugated polymer’s backbone conformation dictates the delocalization of electrons, ultimately affecting its optoelectronic properties. Most conjugated polymers can be viewed as semirigid rods with their backbone embedded among long alkyl side chains. Thus, it is challenging to experimentally quantify the conformation of a conjugated backbone. Here, we performed contrast variation neutron scattering on rigid conjugated donor–acceptor (D–A) diketopyrrolopyrrole (DPP) polymers with selectively deuterated side chains to measure the conjugated backbone conformation. We first synthesized DPP-based polymers with deuterated side chains, confirmed by NMR and FTIR. Using contrast variation neutron scattering, we found that the DPP-based conjugated polymers are much more rigid than poly(3-alkylthiophenes), with persistence length ( L p ) at 16–18 nm versus 2–3 nm. More importantly, in contrast to the relatively flexible poly(3-alkylthiophenes) whose backbone is more flexible than the whole polymer, we found that the backbone of DPP-based polymers has the same L p value compared to the whole polymer chain. This indicates that side chain interference on backbone conformation is not present for the semirigid polymer, which is further confirmed by coarse-grained molecular dynamics (CG-MD) simulations. Our work provides a novel protocol to probe polymer’s backbone conformation and paradigm-shifting understanding of the backbone conformation of semirigid conjugated polymers.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".