Voltage Deviation Improvement in Microgrid Operation through Demand Response Using Imperialist Competitive and Genetic Algorithms
Bibliographic record
Abstract
In recent decades, with the expansion of distributed energy generation technologies and the increasing need for more flexibility and efficiency in energy distribution systems, microgrids have been considered a promising innovative solution for local energy supply and enhancing resilience against network fluctuations. One of the basic challenges in the operation of microgrids is the optimal management of voltage and frequency in the network, which has been the subject of extensive research in the field of microgrid operational optimization. The energy demand is considered a crucial element for energy management due to its fluctuating nature over the day. The use of demand response strategies for energy management is one of the most important factors in dealing with renewables. These strategies enable better energy management in microgrids, thereby improving system efficiency and stability. Given the complexity of optimization problems related to microgrid management, evolutionary optimization algorithms such as the Imperialist Competitive Algorithm (ICA) and Genetic Algorithm (GA) have gained great attention. These algorithms enable solving high-complexity optimization problems by considering various constraints and multiple objectives. In this paper, both ICA and GA, as well as their hybrid application, are used to significantly enhance the voltage regulation in microgrids. The integration of optimization techniques with demand response strategies improves the overall system efficiency and stability. The results proved that the hybrid method provides valuable insights for optimizing energy management systems.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".