MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4403609099 · doi:10.1093/gbe/evae225

Comparative Genomics of the World's Smallest Mammals Reveals Links to Echolocation, Metabolism, and Body Size Plasticity

2024· article· en· W4403609099 on OpenAlexafffund
Marie‐Laurence Cossette, Donald T. Stewart, Aaron B. A. Shafer

Bibliographic record

VenueGenome Biology and Evolution · 2024
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldAgricultural and Biological Sciences
TopicBat Biology and Ecology Studies
Canadian institutionsAcadia UniversityTrent University
FundersNatural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of CanadaCurtin University of TechnologyCompute Canada
KeywordsShrewBiologyHuman echolocationEvolutionary biologyComparative genomicsAdaptation (eye)Convergent evolutionGenomeGenomicsInsectivorePhylogeneticsGeneGeneticsZoologyEcologyNeuroscience

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Originating 30 million years ago, shrews (Soricidae) have diversified into around 400 species worldwide. Shrews display a wide array of adaptations, with some species having developed distinctive traits such as echolocation, underwater diving, and venomous saliva. Accordingly, these tiny insectivores are ideal to study the genomic mechanisms of evolution and adaptation. We conducted a comparative genomic analysis of four shrew species and 16 other mammals to identify genomic variations unique to shrews. Using two existing shrew genomes and two de novo assemblies for the maritime (Sorex maritimensis) and smoky (Sorex fumeus) shrews, we identified mutations in conserved regions of the genomes, also known as accelerated regions, gene families that underwent significant expansion, and positively selected genes. Our analyses unveiled shrew-specific genomic variants in genes associated with the nervous, metabolic, and auditory systems, which can be linked to unique traits in shrews. Notably, genes suggested to be under convergent evolution in echolocating mammals exhibited accelerated regions in shrews, and pathways linked to putative body size plasticity were detected. These findings provide insight into the evolutionary mechanisms shaping shrew species, shedding light on their adaptation and divergence over time.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.821
Threshold uncertainty score0.247

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.022
GPT teacher head0.251
Teacher spread0.229 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations2
Published2024
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueGenome Biology and EvolutionSame topicBat Biology and Ecology StudiesFrench-language works237,207