Quality Competency of Teachers in the Developing Quality Culture in Public Secondary Schools in a Developing Country
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Quality culture has been mentioned as a tool to help improve quality standards and promote the development of educational institutions. Recently, quality culture has begun to be recognized as an interesting research trend in Vietnam, mainly focusing on higher education. Several studies have applied models/types of building and developing quality culture to educational activities and institutions, but not in the national school system. The purpose of this study is to understand the quality capacity of administrators and teachers of public secondary schools in the Southeast region, of Vietnam through the aspect of quality awareness during education. General education implements educational quality accreditation activities. The research uses quantitative research methods combined with qualitative research methods. The survey sample was conveniently selected randomly, information was collected by questionnaire with 749 managers and 3831 teachers, and by interviews with 22 managers and 40 teachers. Quantitative data were calculated by Cronbach's Alpha to eliminate inappropriate variables. Descriptive statistics calculate percentages, mean values, and standard deviations, and inferential statistics test differences using ANOVA and t-test with 2 independent samples. Data analysis results show differences in quality awareness between the three provinces and between managers and teachers, and the results also show that managers and teachers do not have positive views. teacher on educational quality accreditation activities in secondary schools through two contents "Education quality accreditation takes time and resources" and "Education quality accreditation increases achievement problems in education”. Therefore, the study recommends that leaders at all levels research and promulgate quality policies and create conditions for secondary schools to develop quality; Secondary schools build a set of tools and principles for forming and developing a quality culture to improve quality capacity and develop internal quality resources.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.017 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.002 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".