MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4403612974 · doi:10.29169/1927-5951.2024.14.06

Assessment of Obesity Among Pregnant Women in the Volta Region of Ghana

2024· article· en· W4403612974 on OpenAlexvenueno aff
George Aboagye, Gloria Pobee, Jonathan Annan-Asare, Theodosia Adom

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of Pharmacy and Nutrition Sciences · 2024
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicGestational Diabetes Research and Management
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsObesityEnvironmental healthObstetricsMedicineEndocrinology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Background: Obesity remains a rising challenge in both developed and developing countries, and maternal obesity has become one of the most occurring risk factors, which can lead to gestational diabetes, pre-eclampsia and prematurity in obstetric practice for both the mother and the child. Pregnancy is a timeline where obesity cannot be effectively worked on as the mother is more likely to live unhealthy lifestyle such as unhealthy diet, binge eating and less physical activity, which would most likely affect foetal health. This is an issue as most pregnant women in Volta Region are either overweight or obese. This research assessed the prevalence of obesity among pregnant women in the Volta Region of Ghana. Material and Method: A full structured questionnaire was administered to 220 participants based on their knowledge of obesity and its effect on pregnancy, food choices, mealtimes and portion sizes, as well as physical activity during pregnancy. Body weight and height were measured using standardized procedures and body mass index (BMI) was calculated. Overweight and obesity were defined based on WHO criteria. Data analysis was performed using SPSS version 20.0. Results: Based on excessive gestational weight gain, prevalence of obesity among the pregnant women was 54% (119). Majority of respondents had poor knowledge of obesity and its effect on the mother and the foetus, which represented a significant correlation (p< 0.0001) between their caloric intake and high gestational weight gain. Physical activity showed no significant effect (p = 0.2) on gestational weight gain. However, pre-pregnancy BMI of the expectant mothers was directly linked to high gestational weight gain with age being the significant risk factor (p<0.02) for obesity before pregnancy. Conclusion: This research found limited awareness of excessive gestational weight gain and its health consequences among pregnant women and the unborn baby. Therefore, monitoring gestational weight gain using diverse approaches to integrate and manage the condition in routine antenatal care needs consideration.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.008
Threshold uncertainty score0.015

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.055
GPT teacher head0.402
Teacher spread0.347 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2024
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueJournal of Pharmacy and Nutrition SciencesSame topicGestational Diabetes Research and ManagementFrench-language works237,207