The Utilization Pattern of Capture Fisheries in the Limited Utilization Zone of the Gili Matra Marine Protected Area in West Nusa Tenggara Province
Bibliographic record
Abstract
location for capture fisheries activities. However, the management has not yet assessed the area's utilization for capture fisheries activities, necessitating research on the utilization pattern of capture fisheries in the Gili Matra conservation area. This research aims to identify the types of fishing gear used and analyze the size of the dominant fish caught in the Gili Matra marine protected area. This research was conducted from February to April 2024. Data were collected through interviews with respondents and by measuring the length of the fish. The respondents in this study were groups of fishermen who caught fish within the limited utilization zone, selected using the accidental sampling method. The number of fish samples measured in this study was 30 individuals for each fish species. The fish species measured were the dominant species caught in the Gili Matra marine protected area. The data were analyzed using descriptive analysis and length frequency analysis. The study results showed fishermen use bottom handlines, gillnets, and spearguns to catch fish within the limited utilization zone in the Gili Matra marine protected area. The dominant fish species caught in the area were Lutjanus gibbus , Siganus virgatus , and Parepeneus indicus . Almost all of these fish species had capture sizes larger than the length at first maturity.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".