Sam2Rad: A Segmentation Model for Medical Images with Learnable Prompts
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Foundation models like the segment anything model require high-quality manual prompts for medical image segmentation, which is time-consuming and requires expertise. SAM and its variants often fail to segment structures in ultrasound (US) images due to domain shift. We propose Sam2Rad, a prompt learning approach to adapt SAM and its variants for US bone segmentation without human prompts. It introduces a prompt predictor network (PPN) with a cross-attention module to predict prompt embeddings from image encoder features. PPN outputs bounding box and mask prompts, and 256-dimensional embeddings for regions of interest. The framework allows optional manual prompting and can be trained end-to-end using parameter-efficient fine-tuning (PEFT). Sam2Rad was tested on 3 musculoskeletal US datasets: wrist (3822 images), rotator cuff (1605 images), and hip (4849 images). It improved performance across all datasets without manual prompts, increasing Dice scores by 2-7% for hip/wrist and up to 33% for shoulder data. Sam2Rad can be trained with as few as 10 labeled images and is compatible with any SAM architecture for automatic segmentation.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.003 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Open science | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.002 | 0.002 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.004 | 0.002 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".