Survival of antimicrobial resistant <i>Salmonella</i> Heidelberg inoculated into microcosms of fresh pine wood shavings for broiler litter
Bibliographic record
Abstract
This study characterized the genome of three Salmonella enterica serovar Heidelberg ( S. Heidelberg) strains with different antimicrobial resistance (AMR) profile that were inoculated as a cocktail into fresh pine wood shavings (PWS). The strains were isolated from feces (SH-AAFC), carcass (SH-ARS), and thigh (SH-FSIS) of broiler chicken. SH-AAFC harbored an antimicrobial resistant gene (ARG) blaCMY-2 on an IncI1 plasmid while SH-FSIS harbored multiple ARGs ( floR, cmlA1, tet( A), blaTEM-1B, ant( 2″) -Ia, aph( 6) -Id, aph( 3″) -Ib, and sul2) on an IncC plasmid. SH-ARS was pan-susceptible. The die-off of Salmonella was determined at days 0, 1, 7, 14, and 21. Antibiotic susceptibility tests and whole genome sequencing were performed on 77 isolates. At 21 days post-inoculation, Salmonella abundance decreased by 4.4 Log10 CFU/g with the water activity of PWS being correlated with Salmonella survival. SH-AAFC clonal populations survived longer in PWS than SH-FSIS and SH-ARS populations. SH-AAFC clones persisting in litter carried higher copy number of Col plasmids than their ancestors, while some SH-ARS clones acquired a lysogenic bacteriophage from SH-FSIS populations. These results suggest that mobile genetic determinants such as plasmids (which could carry ARGs) and bacteriophage plays roles in the persistence of S. Heidelberg in the PWS used as broiler litter. Highlights S. Heidelberg survived up to 21 days in PWS which is often used as broiler bedding. S. Heidelberg abundance and survival was correlated with the water activity of PWS. S. Heidelberg strains that carried higher copy numbers of small Col plasmids were the dominant strains isolated from PWS at later time points. S. Heidelberg strains harboring transmissible plasmid carrying AmpC-like beta-lactamase gene persisted longer in PWS without antibiotic pressures for AMR.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".