MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort

A parallel compositional reservoir simulator for large-scale CO2 geological storage modeling and assessment

2024· article· en· W4403628846 on OpenAlexaff
Chaojie Di, Yizheng Wei, Kun Wang, Benjieming Liu, Peng Deng, Zhe Sun, Xuantong Lei, Zhangxin Chen

Bibliographic record

VenueThe Science of The Total Environment · 2024
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEnvironmental Science
TopicCO2 Sequestration and Geologic Interactions
Canadian institutionsVirtual Materials Group (Canada)University of Calgary
Fundersnot available
KeywordsReservoir simulationScale (ratio)Computer sciencePetroleum engineeringEnvironmental scienceGeologyGeographyCartography

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Storing CO 2 in deep aquifers and depleted gas reservoirs is an effective way to achieve carbon neutrality. However, the numerical simulation of CO 2 storage in these formations is challenging due to the complexity of gases-brine systems. The number of gas species included in the gases-brine fluid models of existing simulators cannot meet the rapidly evolving CO 2 sequestration scenarios. To address this intricate issue, we developed a three-dimensional fully implicit parallel CO 2 geological storage simulator (PRSI-CGCS) on distributed-memory computers based on our in-house parallel platform. This simulator uses a compositional fluid model with a diverse range of gas species, including CO 2 , C 1 ~ C 3 , N 2 , H 2 S, as well as newly added gases H 2 and O 2 , which may be encountered in geological CO 2 storages. Besides, we provide more suitable scaling factors for different gases in the stability analysis bypassing (SAB) method to accelerate the gases-brine phase equilibrium calculations. PRSI-CGCS does not incorporate energy conservation equations, and salt precipitation or dissolution is also not considered. Numerical experiments show that our simulator is scalable, robust and validated to simulate large-scale CO 2 storage problems with hundreds of millions of grid blocks on a parallel supercomputer cluster. Besides, after our modification on scaling factors, the SAB method can reduce the number of stability analyses by 61.39 % to 88.71 %, thereby reducing simulation time. Furthermore, case studies indicate that injecting O 2 and H 2 along with CO 2 reduces the stability or capacity of CO 2 storage and increases the pressure required for injection. However, this impact is not significant when the impurity content is less than 10 %. • Develop a novel parallel CO 2 geological storage (GCS) simulator • A more diverse gases-brine fluid model for GCS simulation • Applied stability bypassing method to gases-brine fluid model • Demonstrate a competitive parallel computing efficiency compared to other simulators • Provide a detailed workflow of numerical simulator development for other GCS researchers

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.018
Threshold uncertainty score0.913

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0010.001
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.001
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.023
GPT teacher head0.287
Teacher spread0.264 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations13
Published2024
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueThe Science of The Total EnvironmentSame topicCO2 Sequestration and Geologic InteractionsFrench-language works237,207